- I'm actually on the right track with my conclusion! Yay. I've got to summarise my arguments by explaining the insight each argument has provided me and then I go onto my "broader theme" which links to the Q. This should be doable - which is quite an improvement from last time we met.
- Now, the question! After talking with Sir, I can now see the benefits of a precise, accurate, well-worded question - It gives me something to answer. Generally, that's a good quality for an essay to have! That completely explains why I've had so much trouble with my intro and conclusion - it's hard to relate to a question which remains non-existant. So, I've been working on this and have come up with: Examine how the intent of sixties drug-users has been debated in historical works and demonstrate how this has obscured the historical legacy of the psychedelic experience. Before you judge, I know it's not yet perfect but it's a huge improvement from "How has the historiography of the psychedelic experience developed since the 1960s?" So, I'm quite content! :)
- I need to have my synopsis, annotated bibliography, bibliography, blogs and footnoting completed and polished ASAP. Off to work!!
Wednesday, June 23, 2010
Major Project Progress
Met with both Mrs Russo and, later, Mr Carragher today. The main points from these meetings were:
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment